And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
16 June, 2014
13 June, 2014
gee thanks Mr Obama.
I'd just like to say, Thank you President Obama for decimating Al Qaeda and terrorists in Iraq in general
. If not for the determination and steadfastness of such a thoughtful man, it is very probable terrorists would be taking over towns and cities in Iraq killing citizens and destabilizing a nation. Who knows, perhaps Al Qaeda and other terrorists might even try to take Baghdad. Since these terrorists would have had to battle US troops which would have cost some American lives our president was thoughtful enough not to force the issue of keeping enough troops in Iraq. Besides if Obama had kept enough troops in Iraq to prevent this type of incident Obama wouldn't have been able to claim he kept his promise of removing all the troops form Iraq.
Remember the radicalliberal lie, oops I meant cry, Bush lied and troops died. I suppose we can try a different line now. How about... Obama kept his word now terrorists are not deterred.
. If not for the determination and steadfastness of such a thoughtful man, it is very probable terrorists would be taking over towns and cities in Iraq killing citizens and destabilizing a nation. Who knows, perhaps Al Qaeda and other terrorists might even try to take Baghdad. Since these terrorists would have had to battle US troops which would have cost some American lives our president was thoughtful enough not to force the issue of keeping enough troops in Iraq. Besides if Obama had kept enough troops in Iraq to prevent this type of incident Obama wouldn't have been able to claim he kept his promise of removing all the troops form Iraq.
Remember the radical
09 June, 2014
Isaiah 3
1 For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts,
doth take away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff,
the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water,
2 the mighty man, and the man of war,
the judge, and the prophet, and the prudent, and the ancient,
3 the captain of fifty, and the honourable man,
and the counsellor, and the cunning artificer, and the eloquent orator.
4 And I will give children to be their princes,
and babes shall rule over them.
5 And the people shall be oppressed,
every one by another, and every one by his neighbour:
the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient,
and the base against the honourable.
God himself blessed this country and made promises which required our obedience to him and in so doing we would continue to receive his blessings. We have failed to maintain our end of that bargain and we are beginning to see the results of our failures.
oink! oink! said the politician
Today the Senate was discussing student loans with the usual group of liberal Democrat and amongst the brilliant observations there came a question about cost of education in our colleges across the nation and how to help hold back the constant increase in tuition. Since the liberal answer to almost everything is always more government, "which translates to more money", why they pretended this new phenomenon, "cost of education" would suddenly be an issue made no sense to me. The ranks of Senators asking the question like so many in politics these days were possibly lawyers and if not lawyers they were the "big thinkers" from liberal strongholds across the country.
Is there any wonder why the answer could not be found? I personally find their lackluster stab at problem solving amusing to say the least. You want to lower the cost of education then very simply get the damn government out of trying to run education and leave it to the states to do that job, First remove the Fed then secondly stop giving and/or backing loans. As long as these colleges have the assurances government will be backing, (picking up) the cost of tuition there is no reason whatsoever to lower any cost dealing with education including tuition or tenured professors.
What would happen when the funds dry up from Uncle Sam? Very simple all those fancy-schmancy shenanigans would cease and competition for jobs as instructors would increase. Salaries would then follow common sense laws of what a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller. The students who often become professions students would be eliminated, students who use Uncle Sam as a day care centers would no longer be a choice unless that student was independently wealthy. Those doing the admitting would now actually be interested in helping students achieve feasible career choices not just adding another student to the rolls making a bit bigger payday for their institution. At this point public schools managed by the states would see improvements and maybe a real interest by parents and students alike to make sure they are well qualified when it is time to enter the doors of higher education.
So once again the Senate does what it always does they form committees and have hearings time and time again never reaching out to common sense Americans for solutions. Our Government appears to no longer care about the people, they are thinking about themselves, their family and their continued ability to grab a teat to hold on to while they squeeze, twist, squeal, or whatever it takes to make sure they get one more round at the feed-trough of government which is this country's' biggest pig farm.
Now before anyone gets upset about my use of perhaps too colorful language and takes offense I will take this opportunity to express my apologies to any of Americas hard working citizens making their livelihood from actual pig farming. The labor of these hard-working Americans puts billions of dollars into our economy and put people to work which allows them to pay taxes which helps to pay the bill politicians make. Politicians never create or produce any item that adds to the treasury.
To the pigs of this great country and those hard working farmers who maintain those animals. Please accept my apology for comparing the pig to a politician.
Is there any wonder why the answer could not be found? I personally find their lackluster stab at problem solving amusing to say the least. You want to lower the cost of education then very simply get the damn government out of trying to run education and leave it to the states to do that job, First remove the Fed then secondly stop giving and/or backing loans. As long as these colleges have the assurances government will be backing, (picking up) the cost of tuition there is no reason whatsoever to lower any cost dealing with education including tuition or tenured professors.
What would happen when the funds dry up from Uncle Sam? Very simple all those fancy-schmancy shenanigans would cease and competition for jobs as instructors would increase. Salaries would then follow common sense laws of what a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller. The students who often become professions students would be eliminated, students who use Uncle Sam as a day care centers would no longer be a choice unless that student was independently wealthy. Those doing the admitting would now actually be interested in helping students achieve feasible career choices not just adding another student to the rolls making a bit bigger payday for their institution. At this point public schools managed by the states would see improvements and maybe a real interest by parents and students alike to make sure they are well qualified when it is time to enter the doors of higher education.
So once again the Senate does what it always does they form committees and have hearings time and time again never reaching out to common sense Americans for solutions. Our Government appears to no longer care about the people, they are thinking about themselves, their family and their continued ability to grab a teat to hold on to while they squeeze, twist, squeal, or whatever it takes to make sure they get one more round at the feed-trough of government which is this country's' biggest pig farm.
Now before anyone gets upset about my use of perhaps too colorful language and takes offense I will take this opportunity to express my apologies to any of Americas hard working citizens making their livelihood from actual pig farming. The labor of these hard-working Americans puts billions of dollars into our economy and put people to work which allows them to pay taxes which helps to pay the bill politicians make. Politicians never create or produce any item that adds to the treasury.
To the pigs of this great country and those hard working farmers who maintain those animals. Please accept my apology for comparing the pig to a politician.
05 June, 2014
President oops
Me thinks I see lots of stain on the blades of the fan, no? Well perhaps before we all go nuts over this maybe we should look at the real reason for Obama opening the gates of Gitmo. Now that the worst of the worst is no longer in Gitmo what is the reasoning for not letting these low level freedom fighters out and back to some country thereby fulfilling his commitment to close Gitmo before the 2016 election giving the Dems a great commercial for the presidential election.
Perhaps for a few months the rhetoric will be high and loud then after that to the lame stream media it simply becomes yesterdays news. This man in the White House has no conscience.
Perhaps for a few months the rhetoric will be high and loud then after that to the lame stream media it simply becomes yesterdays news. This man in the White House has no conscience.
06 January, 2013
and the reason is...
Pundits on couple shows today brought up the possible nomination of Chuck Hagel and the question of why the president would nominate him knowing the opposition already voiced by many on the republican side. Some say the president wanted to show his willingness to work with the Republicans and various reasons but all or most of the reasons given seemed to try to paint the president a nice guy for nominating Hagel.
The only reason I see for the President to nominate Hagel is simply to give him another opportunity to blame Republicans for something and show the media and his adoring fans those mean old Republicans will do any and everything they can to not allow this president to look good as he saves the country.. The president already knew the Republicans didn't support putting Hagel in that position. So now he can blame something else on those obstructionist Republicans. As everybody knows the only thing the Republicans want is to block and obstruct the president to make him fail. Everyone knows they have done all they can to slow or block progress as the president tries to fulfill his responsibilities and help get on about the business of saving the country. Yep once again this Republican party is showing their willingness to be hostile to the president but it's probably because of their racist attitudes.
The only reason I see for the President to nominate Hagel is simply to give him another opportunity to blame Republicans for something and show the media and his adoring fans those mean old Republicans will do any and everything they can to not allow this president to look good as he saves the country.. The president already knew the Republicans didn't support putting Hagel in that position. So now he can blame something else on those obstructionist Republicans. As everybody knows the only thing the Republicans want is to block and obstruct the president to make him fail. Everyone knows they have done all they can to slow or block progress as the president tries to fulfill his responsibilities and help get on about the business of saving the country. Yep once again this Republican party is showing their willingness to be hostile to the president but it's probably because of their racist attitudes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)