Trouble Foretold

It has been so long since I last made an entry here I had almost forgotten about the site. Lack of posts certainly didn't raise inquiries from anyone so I guess it made no difference if it was sitting idle. I feel as if I may need to bring back something I had from another post here some years ago about a strong man taking the reins in Germany, his name would be former German Defense Minister  Karl Theodore zu Guttenberg
Some years ago his name came up in this magazine which foretold of a strong man coming to power in Germany and this strong man would lead a United Europe in a coming world war III. The current situation in Europe and middle east was prophesied since the mid/late 40's. Get a read on this and become aware of the seriousness concerning world situations in prophecy.

same trouble same people

There has been much reaction about the Ferguson riots and there are the same old faces stirring the trouble. AL Sharpton and Jessie Jackson

more control

Times have changed. Around the world wars have broken out and stability no longer exists in areas which once were calm. Presidents of the past supported Israel but Obama has left Israel hanging out to dry and the rest of the world sees an opportunity to take advantage of the isolation Israel now endures. All it would take to establish a picture of solid friendship would be for Obama to come before the public and say that he stands with Israel one hundred percent and the United States backs Israel and their actions completely.

it is not just kids

Take a walk down your street three times today. At 7 am head down your street and around a few blocks and back home. At about 5 pm do that same walk. Now here it is 12 am, do you feel comfortable enough to take that walk at midnight? There are some areas that people can take walks without fear or worry but there are millions of people who would not put themselves in harms way by doing such a foolish thing. That, is a damn shame and a blight on this nation.

just when you need a presi.....

We have troubles around the world and recently some of those troubles have come to our shores. Time for this president to get off his money raising tours and do what the hell he was hired to do in 2012 and what is the main purpose of that job you ask? Well the main job is

unbelievable

Since when does a country that is being attacked supposed to only respond with a likewise and equal force? This has got to be one of the more stupid ideas coming from Palestinians and those who support them that I have run across since Israel began its life in the late forties. Here we have Hamas lobbing missiles into Israel killing anyone who happens to be where their rocket falls and they demand Israel not use accurate firepower when they respond and not use bigger rocks than what the Palestinians throw. Tough shit! Learn to get along and the problems go away. I say to those whining about Israel hitting back, I say when you're attacked, return the favor with overwhelming force and watch the aggression end.

loving this land

How is your blood pressure? Let me see if I can bring it up a notch or two by giving you the latest great news from our illustrious leader. You know how hard it is to fire one of those, sit on your ass do nothing government employee. These are the ones who are protected by the unions who are only  interested in raising enough money to assure their Democrat meal ticket gets re-elected. Then there's another type of individual out there and these are 180 degrees different from those just mentioned yet still employed by the government. These hard-working people don't have the protection provided by a union but still they give a hundred percent. These particular individuals are called the military and today as in times past these patriots serve this nation by placing themselves in harms way on the front lines around the world. These are the ones who have given their lives in Afghanistahn, Iraq, and throughout the Middle East. Even in the states on our very own bases precious lives have been taken by terrorists we have taken in as friends.

what if?

I've been thinking about Supreme court and how they will vote on the Hobby Lobby decision. I can't see any outcome but the regular 5-4 with Liberals on one side and the supposed Conservatives on the other side. What if that happens...well I'm quite sure it will happen and there may be an event take place afterwards that perhaps very few have not considered.  Judge Ginsburg helped create an organization called Women's Rights Project, and was legal council for the ACLU. That old gal just might get so damn mad because of the vote not going her way she'll call it a terrible decision for women (cause the democrats to kill babies before they get born) that she just may possibly go ahead and retire. Once Ginsburg retires Obama can throw another die hard onto the court.  I don't know but that is just my guess.

opportunity knocks

A person involved in the Benghazi attack was captured today, of course this capture couldn't have taken place right after the attack happened even though his were-a -bouts was well known and giving interviews all along.  Now with this done I'm quite sure Clinton and Obama will now use the talking points of not being able to comment on an on-going investigation whenever one of those obnoxious American citizens ask for answers. And I'm not talking about one of those liberal American citizen cause hey, those folks don't have any questions of this president. How convenient.

the beginning has begun

And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? ⁴ And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. ⁵ For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. ⁶ And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. ⁷ For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. ⁸ All these are the beginning of sorrows.

gee thanks Mr Obama.

I'd just like to say, Thank you President Obama for decimating Al Qaeda and terrorists in Iraq in general
. If not for the determination and steadfastness of such a thoughtful man, it is very probable terrorists would be taking over towns and cities in Iraq killing citizens and destabilizing a nation. Who knows, perhaps Al Qaeda and other terrorists might even try to take Baghdad. Since these terrorists would have had to battle US troops which would have cost some American lives our president was thoughtful enough not to force the issue of keeping enough troops in Iraq. Besides if Obama had kept enough troops in Iraq to prevent this type of incident Obama wouldn't have been able to claim he kept his promise of removing all the troops form Iraq.

Remember the radical liberal lie, oops I meant cry, Bush lied and troops died. I suppose we can try a different line now. How about... Obama kept his word now terrorists are not deterred.

Isaiah 3

¹ For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts,
doth take away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff,
the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water,
² the mighty man, and the man of war,
the judge, and the prophet, and the prudent, and the ancient,
³ the captain of fifty, and the honourable man,
and the counsellor, and the cunning artificer, and the eloquent orator.
⁴ And I will give children to be their princes,
and babes shall rule over them.
⁵ And the people shall be oppressed,
every one by another, and every one by his neighbour:
the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient,
and the base against the honourable.
 
 
  God himself blessed this country and made promises which required our obedience to him and in so doing we would continue to receive his blessings. We have failed to maintain our end of that bargain and we are beginning to see the results of our failures.

oink! oink! said the politician

Today the Senate was discussing student loans with the usual group of liberal Democrat and amongst the brilliant observations there came a question about cost of education in our colleges across the nation and how to help hold back the constant increase in tuition. Since the liberal answer to almost everything is always more government, "which translates to more money", why they pretended this new phenomenon, "cost of education" would suddenly be an issue made no sense to me. The ranks of Senators asking the question like so many in politics these days were possibly lawyers and if not lawyers they were the "big thinkers" from liberal strongholds across the country.

Is there any wonder why the answer could not be found? I personally find their lackluster stab at problem solving amusing to say the least. You want to lower the cost of education then very simply get the damn government out of trying to run education and leave it to the states to do that job, First remove the Fed then secondly stop giving and/or backing loans. As long as these colleges have the assurances government will be backing, (picking up) the cost of tuition there is no reason whatsoever to lower any cost dealing with education including tuition or tenured professors.

What would happen when the funds dry up from Uncle Sam? Very simple all those fancy-schmancy shenanigans would cease and competition for jobs as instructors would increase. Salaries would then follow common sense laws of what a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller. The students who often become professions students would be eliminated, students who use Uncle Sam as a day care centers would no longer be a choice unless that student was independently wealthy. Those doing the admitting would now actually be interested in helping students achieve feasible career choices not just adding another student to the rolls making a bit bigger payday for their institution. At this point public schools managed by the states would see improvements and maybe a real interest by parents and students alike to make sure they are well qualified when it is time to enter the doors of higher education.

So once again the Senate does what it always does they form committees and have hearings time and time again never reaching out to common sense Americans for solutions. Our Government appears to no longer care about the people, they are thinking about themselves, their family and their continued ability to grab a teat to hold on to while they squeeze, twist, squeal, or whatever it takes to make sure they get one more round at the feed-trough of government which is this country's' biggest pig farm.

Now before anyone gets upset about my use of perhaps too colorful language and takes offense I will take this opportunity to express my apologies to any of Americas hard working citizens making their livelihood from actual pig farming.  The labor of these hard-working Americans puts billions of dollars into our economy and put people to work which allows them to pay taxes which helps to pay the bill politicians make. Politicians never create or produce any item that adds to the treasury.

To the pigs of this great country and those hard working farmers who maintain those animals. Please accept my apology for comparing the pig to a politician.
        

President oops

Me thinks I see lots of stain on the blades of the fan, no? Well perhaps before we all go nuts over this maybe we should look at the real reason for Obama opening the gates of Gitmo. Now that the worst of the worst is no longer in Gitmo what is the reasoning for not letting these low level freedom fighters out and back to some country thereby fulfilling his commitment to close Gitmo before the 2016 election giving the Dems a great commercial for the presidential election.

Perhaps for a few months the rhetoric will be high and loud then after that to the lame stream media it simply becomes yesterdays news. This man in the White House has no conscience.

and the reason is...

Pundits on couple shows today brought up the possible nomination of Chuck Hagel and the question of why the president would nominate him knowing the opposition already voiced by many on the republican side. Some say the president wanted to show his willingness to work with the Republicans and various reasons but all or most of the reasons given seemed to try to paint the president a nice guy for nominating Hagel.

The only reason I see for the President to nominate Hagel is simply to give him another opportunity to blame Republicans for something and show the media and his adoring fans those mean old Republicans will do any and everything they can to not allow this president to look good as he saves the country.. The president already knew the Republicans didn't support putting Hagel in that position. So now he can blame something else on those obstructionist Republicans. As everybody knows the only thing the Republicans want is to block and obstruct the president to make him fail. Everyone knows they  have done all they can to slow or block progress as the president tries to fulfill his responsibilities and help get on about the business of saving the country. Yep once again this Republican party is showing their willingness to be hostile to the president but it's probably because of their racist attitudes.

all they want is...

Children were killed in great numbers when a mentally disturbed man walked into their classrooms and shot 26 people and 20 of them being 5-7 year old kids. So now we hear the call for banning guns. Oh they aren't calling it a gun ban of course not. It's the number of bullets in the  clip they want to change. Once they do that then they will be perfectly happy. Yeah really nothing else will be required from the gun people of the country and those gun owners can then be at ease because the gun haters will not need another pound of flesh once they do that, seriously that is it no more. Finally gun rights people can really be thankful that all it took was just to allow them to ban big clips. Wow if only they had known that, well shucks they probably could have banned those old big meanie clips a log time ago.

Surely to hell you don't believe that garbage do you? If you believe that then man do I have a deal for you on a bridge? That is not what they want and this is just the key that unlocks the door on more gun control. Once the door is open you can believe there will be a hell of a lot more taken out of that room than a big clip. Listen to what is being said by them, all I want is smaller clips I don't want anything else. Well maybe just one little thing since we aren't going to have those big clips those guns that shoot real fast we want to slow down the shooting speed. OH and one more little tiny thing since the guns aren't going to be shooting fast then lets make all of them only shoot maybe just three bullets and then only certain small caliber rounds because those big rounds do too much damage and so if we just make them all smaller and that will be the last thing we want. I promise. well perhaps.....

They take that and then they are satisfied. Why would you believe that? They are in fact saying this; I would be satisfied if the kids that were killed in that room were all killed with 22 cal. rounds cause that is a really small bullet. And I would be satisfied if they were only shot one time so just one hole in the body and I can live with that I mean gee whiz nobody wants to see two holes in the head of a child you know, we aren't talking twelfth graders man.

Yeah they would be completely happy now. So the newspaper reads 18 instead of 26 people killed in Conn with legal guns and real small bullets instead of big bullets. Band practice will be next Tuesday in the Gym. New teachers wanted to replace those that were killed with guns holding legal clips and we now have room for more students. Yep I know they would need nothing else if they could just do those couple little things.

phony presidential outrage

Around the country people are asking why the White House sent out Ms Rice to the Sunday morning talk shows and offer up the lie about a video being the reason behind the attacks which killed our Ambassador Stevens. The recent comments from McCain and Lindsey Graham about Rice has riled up a few Democrat members of the house and senate causing them to speak out calling their attacks racist. I think this can be traced back to being one of the reasons Ms Rice was sent out to be the fall person in this Benghazi case.

Ms Rice can't be criticized in the eyes of not only the Democrats but also in the eyes of the liberal media. They will stand behind Rice and cover her ass any time someone speaks out about the Benghazi killings.This will keep the attention of the media focused on the phony issue of race while the real issue of the Benghazi killings go unanswered. I feel this was the reason the White House sent Rice out in the first place. They knew questions would be raised and to avoid answers use the straw man to deflect any questions the press could come up with. I say press I really meant Fox since they are the only ones who really do challenge this president or his administration.

So, from here on you can expect the White House and the Democrats to use the race card against any questions about Benghazi. This will also give the black Caucus more wood to throw on their phony ass race card fire as well. From the attitude of the president in the press conference yesterday I saw he was already loaded with race card bullets and prepared to fire immediately. So from here on the real story about Benghazi will be on the back burner and the race card issue about Ms Rice will have moved to the front burner.

trouble coming

I do not think that Obama has the full interest of America in mind by the actions he has taken since becoming president. Because of the piss ass media we do not have a complete history of who this man really is. There has only been bits and pieces of his life which has been played on TV and that was in an effort to make him look good for the election process. So other than that we have vast areas of his life we know absolutely nothing about.

Now we have the Benghazi incident which has turned into nothing more than a damn TV sex scandal aired for the purpose of deflecting criticism from the president. When Petraeus was being vetted for CIA director you know damn good and well the FBI uncovered the connection between Petraeus and this woman, Broadwell, whom he confessed to having an inappropriate affair with.. If one thinks the FBI could not find something that obvious then they are not worthy of their hire in the first place.

We now know that information was in the hands of the president before he appointed Petraeus and later when that information was needed I believe Obama used it for his benefit. That is when he had Petraeus go before Congress and back up the story about some ignorant ass video. We all know that video was nothing more than a farce and has been proved to be so.

Now we have Petraeus fall on the sword and in the end Obama is safe from being accused of lying about the Benghazi incident. SO what happens now is simple and falls in line with the media who has kissed the ass of Obama since he first came into their sights before he ran for president. And now the media will continue to do everything they can to make sure Obama is never put under that bright spot light and forced to tell the truth where the facts about his life become known.

Benghazi, Petraeus, Affairs, etc.

I've started several posts over the past week or so and this one is about Petraeus and his resignation. I had written before that this action I feel has to do with someone in the administration holding the affair over the head of Petraeus in hopes he would follow the line of the administration was trying to put over on the public about a video being the reason behind the uprisings and then later the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi.

I'm not certain my thoughts are anywhere near the actual facts but it would not surprise me in the least if this was what actually took place. I feel if someone tried to blackmail Petraeus then he would have not been able to let the honor of his office fold under the blackmail threat no matter the pain it would bring to him personally. At the moment he has chosen to not appear or someone has said he will not appear before congress at the  moment. I'm sure when the time comes Petraeus will certainly go before them without any threat. However I wonder about Clinton and the fight she may try to put up when she's called before then members of Congress to answer questions in this investigation. Time will tell..

results a lie?

There is a rumor that the Democrat Party will throw out some poll numbers later in the day but before the real numbers come out and they will suggest the democrats are winning the election in hopes of suppressing the Republican vote. This will also play a hand in Obama and the democrats calling up the lawyers and get this involved in the courts and once again claim "They Cheated".

If this happens it would be time for Obama to up the ante and claim he needs to hold things in limbo till it all gets straightened out. At one time something like that would have been called Marshall Law. But of course nothing like that could ever happen to the US, I mean that would never happen right?

But if things do go for Obama then what is in store for America will not be a good thing. There are just too many unknowns about this president for me to feel comfortable with that outcome. You see this time around he will not have any reason to worry about another election and therefore will do whatever the hell he wants with whichever country or leader he so chooses.